SCGA-BS-003 → BS-005
Three prospective examinations of one narrow execution-boundary proposition. Failed predecessors remain failed. The supported successor stands only on evidence earned under its own frozen criterion.
Claim boundary ultimately supported
Under the BS-005 frozen examination, the controlled material state transition invalidated the prior-state standing required for the same consequence. This is a bounded implementation finding, not a claim that Harmonic detects every material change in reality and not a claim about downstream real-world execution enforcement.
Lineage
Positive control: REFUSED. The native packet omitted the required obligation witness.
Negative: REFUSED. Target survived this test.
Falsifier: Not triggered.
Final reading: Full discrimination was not established. The positive control was constitutionally incomplete. No rerun, repair, or remap.
Positive control: expected PERMITTED; observed CONSTRAINED / admissible=true / action=constrain.
Negative: REFUSED / admissible=false. Target survived this test.
Falsifier: Not triggered.
Final reading: Full counterfactual discrimination was not established because the frozen positive-control criterion required PERMITTED. Later source review explained the mismatch; it did not rewrite the result.
Positive control: CONSTRAINED / admissible=true / action=constrain — PASS under the frozen BS-005 criterion.
Negative: REFUSED / admissible=false / action=refuse after one controlled material state transition.
Falsifier: Not triggered.
Final reading: Supported survival condition satisfied for the frozen proposition.
What changed across the examinations
BS-003 reached current Understanding, Reality Contact, and Authority Continuity, but its positive control failed closed at Obligation Continuity because the required obligation witness was not provided. BS-004 prospectively closed that missing-obligation issue.
In BS-004, the positive control reached UNDERSTANDING_CURRENT, CONTACT_CONFIRMED, AUTHORITY_CONTINUOUS, OBLIGATIONS_SATISFIED, and BOUNDARY_ELEVATED, then returned runtime CONDITIONALLY_ADMISSIBLE / admissible=true / action=constrain. Because the frozen criterion required PERMITTED, the positive control remained a failure.
Subsequent source inspection established that the surviving high_consequence_level warning is native to the examined high-consequence class and drives the constrained-but-admissible disposition. That explained the mismatch without retroactively changing BS-004. BS-005 was then constituted prospectively against the established native high-consequence contract.
BS-005 supported result
CONSTRAINED / admissible=true / action=constrain — PASS under the frozen BS-005 criterion.REFUSED / admissible=false / action=refuse.high_consequence_level remained common to both specimens.CONTACT_CONFIRMED in both specimens.BS-005 production persistence
The preserved database identifies the specimens directly as SCGA-BS-005-PC-001 and SCGA-BS-005-NEG-001. Both ran on runtime 4.1.0 with Governance Pack 1.10.0-v4.1-governance-visibility-upgrade.
The complete recovered record includes request/trace IDs, runtime-input snapshots, all primitive versions and hashes, response-binding hashes, source-runtime-artifact hashes, and infrastructure persistence timestamps. No unrecovered receipt hash is asserted.
What this establishes
The BS-005 evidence supports the proposition that, in the examined native governed disposition path, a historically valid state did not silently retain consequential standing after the controlled material state transition invalidated the prior-state standing required for the same consequence.
This record does not establish:
Preservation rule
Preserved BS-003 identifiers
This repository snapshot records the adjudicative findings, the known BS-003 artifact identities, and the recovered BS-005 production-persistence fingerprints. It does not manufacture or reconstruct missing frozen BS-004/BS-005 raw execution bundles.
Later successor evidence
The BS-003 → BS-005 record above remains bounded to its own frozen criteria. A later prospectively constituted examination, V113 Complete Information Successor Examination, tested a complete-information temporal-standing discrimination pair at the governed-response boundary. V109 and V112 remain preserved predecessor examinations; V113 does not retroactively alter their results.